02111
|
Include CAGE and Mfr Part Nbr data in views
|
Warehouse |
ASAALT |
New |
Change Request:
Process Improvement
Description:
The MFR Part number is not list of the DPAS grids and /or reports that are associated to inventory data. The stock number and specifically the AESIP stock number that is created for MANP records is not physically labeled on the equipment. Since this stock number is created by AESIP and can only been seen in DPAS the users had no way of easily referencing the equipment when the equipment is labeled by MFR part number.
Recommended:
Add the MFR part number(s), MFR name(s), and MFR CAGE(s) as optional data fields to be added to each grid search, grid data view and the reports such as the ICN report that relate to inventory information. These data fields should be optional and should be available for export when saving out a report.
Mission Critical: Provides the CAGE and Part Nbr of the actual item (real identifiers) to the user whereas the AESIP Stock Nbr represents the AESIP database row ky which has no relationship to the item. It also provides more informed information when the Mfr Part Nbr data is more than 15 characters (Stock Nbr max length).
Benefits:
Provides the CAGE and Part Nbr of the actual item (real identifiers) to the user whereas the AESIP Stock Nbr represents the AESIP database row ky which has no relationship to the item. It also provides more informed information when the Mfr Part Nbr data is more than 15 characters (Stock Nbr max length).
Frequency:
Daily
Users:
All users of the DPAS Warehouse Mgmt application. |
02110
|
DD Form 1149 Warehouse Transfer form improvements
|
Warehouse |
ASAALT |
New |
Change Request:
Process Improvement
Description:
When performing a warehouse to warehouse transfer the DD1149 that is generated as a PDF states that the transfer is a "LOCAL DELIVERY". This is not alway the case. This text isn't easily remove or edited. When performing a warehouse to warehouse transfer the users needs to the option to populate the required data elements of the DD 1149. The user needs the option to populate this within DPAS so that the DD 1149 can be regenerated with all data elements at any time.
Recommended:
Please remove the words "LOCAL DELIVERY" from the DD 1149 that is generated when performing a warehouse to warehouse transfer. Provide an additional warehouse to warehouser transfer page (or shipping detail page) containing the following DD 1149 data elements: Ship to - Marked For, Appropriations Data,Requisition Num, Priority, Authority or Purpose, Voucher Number &Date (a and b), Date Shipped, Mode of Shipment, Bill of Lading Number, Air Movement Designator or port reference no. along with the option to populate the container type information with description, size and weight.
Mission Critical: Improves the use of the DD Form 1149 for Warehouse transfers
Benefits:
This request is mandatory to help the PEO be audit ready. This information should be easily accessible within the APSR. The users should not have to maintain addition shipping details information outside the application being used to document the shipping (transfer) transaction.
Frequency:
Monthly
Users:
All DPAS users of the Warehouse Transfer process. |
02109
|
Generate a Physical Inventory request upon receipt of a MRO denial
|
Materiel Management |
Leidos |
New |
Change Request:
Process Improvement
Description:
When DPAS Materiel Mgmt. receives a denial response (DLMS 945A) from a RSA that was requested to perform an issue, DPAS sets the CR/DRO/RDO to "plan" for the item manager to take additional action. They have the option to deny, back order, DVD or issue a substitute. What the system is missing is the systematic generation of the request to conduct a physical inventory as a result of the denial.
Recommended:
1. When processing the MRO denial from the RSA, systematically schedule a physical inventory request to the RSA using the key data from the CR/DRO/RDO - Stock Nbr, Condition Code, Purpose Code, and Project Code. 2. Transmit the inventory request via a DLMS 846P.
Mission Critical: The implementation of this SCR is in support of USMC's DPAS implementation (Phase 1a).
Benefits:
Provides all DPAS MM customers with the systematic generation of a Physical Inventory request for a MRO denial. The PI, once conducted will result in the warehouse locating the materiel or making the needed inventory adjustment(s).
Frequency:
Daily
Users:
This change impacts all customers of Materiel Mgmt. and those users of the MRO within Warehouse Mgmt. |
02102
|
Receipt Reversal
|
PA,Materiel Management |
AF: A4/HAF FH-AFHAF |
New |
Change Request:
Policy/Regulatory
Description:
Currently the only transaction that has a reversal process is the 'Disposal' process. In order for the ICP requisition to close out the 'Local Due-in' needs to be processed in PA for the 527R DLMS to be sent from the ICP to the SOS Materiel Receipt Acknowledgment (MRA) to close the requisition. However there have been instances where a receipt was processed in error, which has caused the ICP requisition to remain open. This has caused additional work, that requires DPAS to manually close out the requisition in ICP, and remove the 'Local Due-in' in PA, which neither process sends out the 527R TH MRA. Additionally the SOS also needs to manually close out the requisition on their end, all causing a break in the audit trail.
Recommended:
Create a reversal process for receipts that will also allow for the stock number/serial number combination to be utilized when reprocessing the receipt with the correct 'Local Due- In'.
Mission Critical: DLMS 4000.25 Vol 2 Chap 10
Benefits:
This will limit the additional workload of manually closing out a requisition and rejecting the 'Local Due-in'. This will also ensure that the audit trail can be traced from the initial requirement to the receipt acknowledgment (527R TH) back to the SOS to close out the requisition.
Frequency:
Daily
Users:
All DAF activities processing receipts for ICP requisitions. |
02108
|
Unit Issue Appt Edit Capability and Cancellation Job Updates
|
Warehouse |
Leidos |
New |
Change Request:
Process Improvement
Description:
DPAS currently does not update an existing appointment if you edit the unit issue request, requested date and time. For unit issue requests that require staging, the appointment immediately goes into an in-progress state, however an appointment date/time does not populate on the appointment grid. Once the appointment is in progress, it triggers a count down for the appointment cancel job. This issue was reported by CSP (Help Ticket 102384 / ADO 132620) during research and testing, it was determined that there were a couple of pieces of code that were missed.
Recommended: The recommended solution that when a unit issue request appointment is created, start_dt_tm and end_dt_tm are set based off the requested date/time in the Unit Issue Request. This would create an Appointment Date/Time to populate in the appointment grid, which would let the appointment cancel job cancel appointments correctly.
Mission Critical: Will improve user functionality for unit issue appointments. The goal is for appointments to accurately receive for the service center.
Benefits:
By improving the unit issue appointments process, it alleviates undue stress on custodians who currently receive email notification their appointments have been canceled. It also provides the service center with accurate appointment information for planning and staffing purposes.
Frequency:
Daily
Users:
All members that use Unit Issue Request for Appointment processes. |
02107
|
Incorporate FMS fields into Customer Requisition / Materiel Release Order
|
Warehouse,Materiel Management |
Leidos |
New |
Change Request:
Process Improvement
Description:
1. USMC requires the capability to issue materiel in support of the Security Assistance Program. There is a requirement to additional fields to track the issuance of this materiel and in some instances the cost could be different than the DOD Standard Price.
2. The price/cost used is to be the the security assistance agreement price.
2. This SCR incorporates additional fields into Customer Requisition in MM and Materiel Release Order in WM that identify the Security Assistance agreement number.
Recommended:1. Modify CR in MM to provide for the entry of additional Security Assistance data elements and the entry of the agreement price.
2. Modify DLMS 940R and DLMS 945A to enable data exchange of the additional fields / cost between MM/WM and WM/TMS.
3. Modify MRO in WM to display and/or the entry of additional Security Assistance fields.
4. Modify DLMS 856S Shipment Status to contain the additional fields.
5. Modify DD Form 1348 to display additional FMS field and the cost the government has approved for the item.
6. Modify MM In-transit tracking to contain the security assistance fields.
Mission Critical:Supports DLM 4000.25
Supports DLMS 940R, 945A, and 856S Implementation Conventions (ICs)
The implementation of this SCR is in support of USMC's DPAS implementation (Phase 1b).
Benefits: Provides all DPAS customers with the capability to perform manage Security Assistance issues.
Frequency:
Weekly
Users:
This change impacts all customers of Materiel Mgmt. and those users of the MRO within Warehouse Mgmt. |
02106
|
FAST Disposition Reason
|
MU |
AF: VSCOS |
New |
Change Request:
Process Improvement
Description:
Process disconnect within UIC to UIC transfers for FAST Reportable vehicles. System requires FAST Disposition Reason input during transfer, however, the PA and M&U transactions prevent the gaining and losing Maintenance Activity (MA) to complete action. The gaining MA can profile a transferred asset if there is not a work order open for the asset. Normal process is the gaining MA profiles and opens a work order processing asset into new UIC. However, this actions prevents the losing MA inputting a FAST Disposition Reason to drop the asset from losing MA causing asset to remain within AWD status in the losing MA. This presents data integrity issue during FAST reporting as MA cannot input FAST disposition reason.
Recommended: Completing PA UIC to UIC transfers within specific site generates an automatic system action (i.e., M&U) to remove AWD status from losing Maintenance Activity (MA). System must automatically clear the FAST Disposition Reason with ‘N/A – Not Applicable; vehicle is not disposed’ and generate an Open Action (e.g., Homepage display) notifying losing MA asset is no longer within MA and system transferred asset to gaining MA is complete. Additionally, system must generate an Open Action to clear any FAST Disposition Reason for all FAST Reportable assets disposition within PA. Finally, add a column to M&U MAM Search Results for AWD status. This allows another search tool identifying assets are ready for FAST Disposition Reason after PA disposition other than UIC to UIC as this is automatic as recommended above.
Mission Critical: Department of the Air Force Instruction 24-302 VEHICLE MANAGEMENT, Section 8.4 Annual FAST Report
Benefits: Streamline UIC to UIC transfer process by automating some of the steps, while ensuring accurate FAST Reporting by informing maintenance activity that FAST Disposition Reasons are ready/require action.
Frequency:
Daily
Users:
This process improvement benefits DOD agencies and military services on a daily basis. |
02105
|
Work Plan Site Restriction
|
MU |
AF: VSCOS |
New |
Change Request:
Process Improvement
Description:
DPAS flexibility searching and selecting Work Plans causes data integrity issues within DF-VEHS site. Currently, DPAS does not limit search results to within specific site(s) and wide-open searches present all DPAS Work Plans allowing user to select incorrect plan. While Work Plan may look similar, the differences drive data inconsistencies easily preventable with site specific work plans.
Recommended: Limit Work Plans (public work plans) to owning site (i.e., DF-VEHS), or an option within Master Data/Maintenance Program restricting system to site specific Work Plans (e.g., toggle). A toggle or restriction will resolve data integrity isse with reference to Work Plans and eliminate Work Plan selection confusion for all sites utilizing DPAS M&U.
Mission Critical: Department of the Air Force Instruction 24-302 VEHICLE MANAGEMENT, Section 7C Vehicle & Equipment Work Order
Benefits:
Significantly increase data accuracy and streamline user experience with work order creation process.
Frequency:
Daily
Users:
This process improvement benefits DOD agencies and military services on a daily basis. |
02105
|
Work Plan Site Restriction
|
MU |
AF |
New |
Change Request:
Process Improvement
Description:
DPAS flexibility searching and selecting Work Plans causes data integrity issues within DF-VEHS site. Currently, DPAS does not limit search results to within specific site(s) and wide-open searches present all DPAS Work Plans allowing user to select incorrect plan. While Work Plan may look similar, the differences drive data inconsistencies easily preventable with site specific work plans.
Recommended: Limit Work Plans (public work plans) to owning site (i.e., DF-VEHS), or an option within Master Data/Maintenance Program restricting system to site specific Work Plans (e.g., toggle). A toggle or restriction will resolve data integrity isse with reference to Work Plans and eliminate Work Plan selection confusion for all sites utilizing DPAS M&U.
Mission Critical: Department of the Air Force Instruction 24-302 VEHICLE MANAGEMENT, Section 7C Vehicle & Equipment Work Order
Benefits:
Significantly increase data accuracy and streamline user experience with work order creation process.
Frequency:
Daily
Users:
This process improvement benefits DOD agencies and military services on a daily basis. |
02104
|
Incorporate "Mark For" capabilities within Materiel and Warehouse Mgmt. applications
|
Warehouse,Materiel Management |
Leidos |
New |
Change Request: Process Improvement
Description:
USMC requires the capability to enter a "Mark For" Address. Currently DPAS does not support the "Mark For". The proposed solution is to incorporate the entry/selection of a Mark For (RIC/DoDAAC/MAPAD/Text) within CR, DRO and RDO within Materiel Mgmt and within MRO within Warehouse Mgmt.
Recommended:1. Modify CR, DRO, RDO to allow for the entry of the "Mark For". The "Mark For" will be transmitted to the RSA via the DLMS 940R.
2. The Warehouse Mgmt. application will inbound the DLMS 940R and include the Mark For" data in the MRO. When present in the DLMS 940R, do not permit change by warehouse personnel. When absent, allow warehouse personnel to enter a Mark For.
3. Include the "Mark For" data in the Transshipment DLMS 940R request that is transmitted to the TMS for inclusion in the print of the Shipping Label.
4. Incorporate the applicable "Mark For" data in the print of the DD Form 1348.
Mission Critical:Supports MIL-STD-129P
Supports DLM 4000.25
Supports DLMS 940R IC
Benefits: Provides all DPAS customers that utilize Materiel Mgmt., and MRO within Warehouse Mgmt. with the capability to utilize "Mark For".
Frequency:
Hourly
Users:
This change impacts all customers of Materiel Mgmt. and those users of the MRO within Warehouse Mgmt. |
02104
|
Incorporate "Mark For" capabilities within Materiel and Warehouse Mgmt. applications
|
Warehouse,Materiel Management |
Leidos |
New |
Change Request: Process Improvement
Description:
USMC requires the capability to enter a "Mark For" Address. Currently DPAS does not support the "Mark For". The proposed solution is to incorporate the entry/selection of a Mark For (RIC/DoDAAC/MAPAD/Text) within CR, DRO and RDO within Materiel Mgmt and within MRO within Warehouse Mgmt.
Recommended:1. Modify CR, DRO, RDO to allow for the entry of the "Mark For". The "Mark For" will be transmitted to the RSA via the DLMS 940R.
2. The Warehouse Mgmt. application will inbound the DLMS 940R and include the Mark For" data in the MRO. When present in the DLMS 940R, do not permit change by warehouse personnel. When absent, allow warehouse personnel to enter a Mark For.
3. Include the "Mark For" data in the Transshipment DLMS 940R request that is transmitted to the TMS for inclusion in the print of the Shipping Label.
4. Incorporate the applicable "Mark For" data in the print of the DD Form 1348.
Mission Critical:Supports MIL-STD-129P
Supports DLM 4000.25
Supports DLMS 940R IC
Benefits: Provides all DPAS customers that utilize Materiel Mgmt., and MRO within Warehouse Mgmt. with the capability to utilize "Mark For".
Frequency:
Hourly
Users:
This change impacts all customers of Materiel Mgmt. and those users of the MRO within Warehouse Mgmt. |
02103
|
Delinquent Temp Loan Report
|
Warehouse |
NBG-2 |
New |
Change Request:
Process Improvement
Description:
Organizational Tool Issue requires daily report of all temp loaned tools that are delinquent in their return; DPAS does not provide a report or inquiry with this parameter
Recommended: Inquiries > Issue / Return Activity: Include Inquiry Type "Temp Loaned with Return Details", and engage the "Only Outstanding Items" to only show items currently outstanding
Mission Critical: ACU4INST 5530.14L section 5.a.(3). Tools that have not been returned by 1600 to Tool Issue will be considered delinquent unless signed out overnight. The Commanding Officer of Assault Craft Unit Four mandates that an email be sent to all E-7 and above listing all delinquent tools each day.
Benefits: Allows organizations to monitor temporary loaned assets that are delinquent in an concise report for distribution to leadership and all relevant personnel
Frequency:
Daily
Users:
20 |
02101
|
Document Control role for attachments on pending transactions
|
PA |
FH-AFHAF |
New |
Change Request:
Process Improvement
Description:
Currently once an asset is in pending transfer or disposal the property record is frozen and the user is not able to attach any documentation to the property record
Recommended: Create a new role that will allow for attachments to be uploaded while the property record in pending status ( ie. Receiving, Transfer, Dispositions)
Mission Critical: In order to track physical possession of an asset, the losing Logistics Readiness Squadron (LRS) requires signature to establish positive control of assets as they are moved to losing outbound cargo section or gaining LRS. The DAF requires signatures for acceptance of the property in transit.
Benefits: This meets FIAR compliance to ensure property Key Supporting Document (KSD)s are maintained and part of the property record from cradle to grave.
Frequency:
Daily
Users:
All users FH-AFHAF Site-id |
02100
|
Add TAC address to Customer Requisition/RDO/DRO
|
Warehouse,Materiel Management |
Leidos |
New |
Change Request:
Process Improvement
Description:
USMC requires the capability for the LOGCOM Item Managers to be able to assign the transportation account code to be used with the shipment of the (CR,DRO,RDO). Currently DPAS has the TAC the assignment within the Warehouse MRO process. USMC has requirement to allow the Item Managers to select specific assets (Serial Nbr / UII) for shipment. Currently DPAS provides for this information to be entered within the instruction area.
Recommended: 1. Modify CR, DRO, RDO to allow for the entry of a TAC. The TAC will be transmitted to the RSA via the DLMS 940R. TAC will be optional as not all issue actions require transportation services. When the TAC is absent, allow the warehouse to enter it. When entered by the Item Manager, do not allow the warehouse to modify the value. 2. Modify CR, DRO, RDO to allow for the selection of specific assets by Serial Nbr / UII. When selected, this information will be transmitted to the RSA via the DLMS 940R. Within the MRO process of the DPAS warehouse application, feed the serial nbrs/uii into the inventory selector along with Stock Nbr, Condition Cd, Purpose Cd, and Project Cd. Should the RSA not able to pick / ship the specific item, deny the issue request via the DLMS 945A.
Mission Critical: These changes implement Defense Logistics Management Standards Changes 1462B (Serial Nbr / UII addition), and 1206 (Transportation Account Code)
Benefits: Provides USMC the capabilities required to communicate systematically with RSA systems.
Frequency:
Daily
Users:
This change impacts all customers of Materiel Mgmt. |
02099
|
Access History Inquiry
|
Enterprise |
VSCOS |
New |
Change Request: Process Improvement
Description: DPAS is in need of an inquiry system that provides clear visibility into user access history for both current and past role assignments. This data is essential for IO’s and AIO’s as it helps them verify whether users have the appropriate roles and access levels. Without this information it becomes challenging to assess compliance and ensure that users are not over-privileged or under privileged. Therefore, implementing such a system is crucial for maintaining proper access control.
The challenge of meeting organization audit requirements significantly affects the ability to conduct a thorough DPAS annual user access review. This situation makes it difficult to ensure that only authorized individuals have access to sensitive information. Additionally, the ongoing monitoring of user access becomes less effective leading to potential security risks. Without proper oversight the organization may struggle to identify unauthorized users or detect unusual activities. As a result maintaining a secure environment becomes increasingly challenging.
Having clear visibility into data management processes is crucial for DPAS Security and Support personnel. This transparency reduces the need for Database Administrators (DBAs) to run scripts just to collect necessary information for organizations and audit Program Control Boards (PCBs). With easier access to data support teams can respond to user inquiries more quickly and effectively. This improvement not only benefits the users but also helps Information Owners manage their data better. Overall enhancing visibility streamlines operations and increases efficiency across the board.
Recommended: Creating an Access History Inquiry is essential for monitoring user permissions. This inquiry will provide clear records of when a user's tier and role access were added or removed. It will display both current and historical information showing the exact date and time of each change. By organizing this data administrators can easily track adjustments and ensure users have the correct access levels. Overall, this tool will help maintain security and accountability within the system.
Mission Critical: Each year IO/AIO is responsible for conducting a user audit and informing the DPAS PMO once it is completed. Monitoring roles and user access such as ensuring there is a separation of duties and preventing unauthorized access to MAs or warehouses is crucial for every agency. Unfortunately the current system tools used for this task are displaying incomplete information making it difficult to effectively perform these important functions.
Benefits: By providing an history Inquiry for UIC and Maintenance Activity the IO/AIOs will have a clearer understanding of the UIC and Maintenance activity required for each user. This will help in determining whether these UIC or Mx Activity are essential for the user to effectively utilize the system. Having this history will streamline the process of assigning UIC and Mx Activity ensuring that each user has the necessary permissions and access rights. This will ultimately lead to a more organized and efficient system for all users involved.
Frequency: Daily
Users: Unsure how many Agencies and IO/AIOs are in DPAS, but this will impact all of them. |
02098
|
Enterprise Appropriation Tech Refresh
|
PA |
Leidos |
New |
Change Request: Process Improvement
Description: The Appropriation AUD screens in DPAS PA and MM modules do not employ modern technical solutions, and the fields in PA and MM Appropriation are not equivalent, containing different fields. This SCR is to Tech Refresh the Appropriation AUD to enable it to be deployed as part of the enterprise accounting service for use with all DPAS applications. The appropriation attributes will be updated to use the Standard Financial Information Structure (SFIS) attribute names.
Recommended: Modernize the Appropriation AUD process for DPAS Accounting and match the PA Appropriation fields to the modernized Appropriation fields.
Mission Critical: The data elements in DoD OUSD SFIS guidance, Standard Line of Accounting business practice, and DLMS implementation business rules use modern nomenclature currently not used in PA Appropriation AUD. In addition, DoD FMR 7000.14R requires certain data elements to be used in accounting processes.
Benefits: Modernized functionality and similar fields across DPAS modules within Appropriation AUD processes. This will also better prepare Accounting to handle Fixed Asset accounting transactions.
Frequency: Daily
Users: Data established in this process is used by Accounting users on a regular basis. This will impact enterprise accounting which will affect a growing number of users as more use the accounting processes. |
02097
|
Adding MAJCOM filter to Inquiry
|
MU |
AvSE |
New |
Change Request: Process Improvement
Description: Currently, the DPAS Maintenance & Utilization (M&U) module does not allow users to filter or sort inquiries by MAJCOM (Major Command). This limitation complicates the ability to quickly locate and analyze data specific to a particular MAJCOM, resulting in inefficiencies in reporting and decision-making processes. Users must manually sift through extensive datasets to isolate MAJCOM-specific information, which increases the risk of error and reduces productivity.
Recommended: Enhance the inquiry search functionality to include a dropdown menu or selection box for MAJCOM as a filter criterion. This would allow users to limit inquiry results to a specific MAJCOM.
Mission Critical: MAJCOM A4 leaders are not able to pull single, all-encompassing report for their respective MAJCOM maintenance activities at this time. They do not have access to PA, only the M&U module, so it is imperative that they are able to over high-level oversight of their AvSE fleet health.
Benefits: Reduces time spent searching and analyzing MAJCOM-specific data, Increases accuracy by eliminating manual data isolation errors, Streamlines reporting and decision-making with faster, targeted insights, Improves user experience by simplifying searches and enhancing system usability, Aligns with organizational goals for data-driven decisions and efficient resource management.
Frequency: Daily
Users: The inquiry process is used by 100s of users multiple times a day. |
02096
|
General Database Infrastructural Changes - CY 2025
|
Other |
Leidos |
New |
Change Request: Process Improvement
Description: In many application releases, the Leidos team needs to implement various database infrastructural changes and improvements. These changes include, but are not limited to, index adjustments, configuration changes, and the implementation of database utility objects. These changes and capabilities can not be invoked directly through the application but are nonetheless necessary for the availability, correctness, and performance of the DPAS system. I am requesting an SCR for calendar year 2025 to encompass this category of database changes.
Recommended: Implementation of any database infrastructural changes and improvements deemed necessary by the Leidos Team.
Mission Critical:
Benefits: These changes and capabilities can not be invoked directly through the application but are nonetheless necessary for the availability, integrity, and performance of the DPAS system.
Frequency: Daily
Users: N/A - Infrastructural enhancements that wouldn't directly affect the users. |
02095
|
Modify when attachments can be added to a MRO
|
Warehouse |
ASAALT |
New |
Change Request: Process Improvement
Description: Currently we are unable to upload supporting documentation to a close MRO's only if the MRO has not been released or shipped. When processing an MRO in DPAS we must mark the MRO as shipped for the DLMS transaction to be pushed to G-Army. When the MRO is shipped the transaction is closed. However, at that time we may not have the signed receiving documentation such as DD1348, 1149, or DA3161 because the Property Book Office (PBO) is waiting to see the transaction show up in G-Army. Once the PBO can see and verify the transaction in G-Army they sign the receiving documentation. For auditability we should be able to upload this signed document into DPAS as supporting documentation for the MRO.
Recommended: All the option to upload documentation to any MRO record even it if is in a released, shipped/closed status.
Mission Critical: To improve MRO in supporting KSDs
Benefits: By allow the user the option to upload supporting documentation to the MRO transaction within DPAS even when the transaction is closed it will provide better accountability and auditability of government property.
Frequency: Weekly
Users: All user trying to maintain auditability for government property within DPAS. |
02094
|
Add SKO Component List to Inventory Reports
|
Warehouse |
NECC |
New |
Change Request: Process Improvement
Description: When inventorying a SKO'd item, the only stock number that populates is that of the actual SKO, and not the components attached to the SKO.
Recommended: Add the ability to view the list of components attached to the SKO for all physical inventory reports.
Mission Critical: NECC 5200.45
Benefits: This will give the users who utilize SKO's visibility of what components they need to verify and inventory for. Makes it easier for the end user to inventory when the SKO stock nbr is different than the main component item.
Frequency: Daily
Users: NECC-wide |
|